Neethi v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.6872 of 2015 1 NEETHI 2 KASI ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CUMBUM NORTH POLICE STATION, THENI DIST.
CR.NO. 151 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.K.MANICKAM Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 379 of I.P.C. r/w. 21 of 4(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Mines and Minerals Development Regulation Act, 1957 in Crime No.151 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused have committed theft of one unit sand on 05.04.2015.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the petitioners are having one previous case of similar nature.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 15/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM.
2 Do - Through THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CUMBUM NORTH POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.A.K.MANICKAM Advocate SR.No. 18998. TS/17.04.2015/2P-6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.6872 of 2015 Date :15/04/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/