Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12983/2017ordered

M.Saravana Perumal, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-09-27Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN CRL OP(MD) No.12983 of 2017 M.SARAVANA PERUMAL, ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.7 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVILPATTI WEST POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.412/2017) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.P.KARUPASAMY Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 395 & 398 of IPC, in Crime No.412 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court had already granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD) No.10194 of 2017, vide order dated 04.08.2017 on condition that the petitioner shall execute sureties within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. But the petitioner could not execute the sureties within the time prescribed by this Court. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for anticipatory bail.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor affirms the above said fact.

4. This Court heard the submissions made on either side and perused the order passed in Crl.O.P(MD)No.10194 of 2017, dated 04.08.2017.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that this Court had already granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.10194 of 2017, dated 04.08.2017, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti and executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of one week from today, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 27/09/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, AM/TA Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KOVILPATTI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVILPATTI WEST POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.P.KARUPASAMY Advocate SR.No.31771 GJM/RR/BS/SAR-I-3.10.17-2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12983 of 2017 Date :27/09/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/