Baskara Pandian v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Sixteenth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.6907 of 2015 BASKARA PANDIAN ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMMAYANAICKANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST. IN CR.NO.85 OF 2015.
... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.PITCHAI MUTHU Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is accused No.1 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 170, 420 r/w. Section 5 of Embalam and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 in Crime No.85 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has given advertisement stating that he is a Secretary of Human Rights Organisation, South Zone.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no complaint from any public and the case was registered on the basis of the complaint given by Head Constable of Ammayanaickaur Police Station. It is further submitted that the second accused in this case was granted anticipatory bail by the Principal Sessions Court, Dindigul in Cr.M.P.No.559 of 2015 on 13.03.2015.
4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 16/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI.
2 Do - Through THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMMAYANAICKANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.M.PITCHAI MUTHU Advocate SR.No. 19488. TS/22.04.2015/2P-6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.6907 of 2015 Date :16/04/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/