Karuppasamy Pandian v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN CRL OP(MD) No.12998 of 2017 1 KARUPPASAMY PANDIAN 2 VALLIAMMAL 3 MADASAMY 4 RAJA 5 CHELLADURAI 6 NACHIYAR 7 PARVATHI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI CITY, CR. NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The learned counsel for the petitioners is present. 2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that no petition and no FIR is pending against the petitioner. He further submitted that the alleged threat of arrest is not true.

3.Recording the said statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side), this Criminal Original petition is closed.

sd/- 27/09/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI CITY.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.32012

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12998 of 2017 Date :27/09/2017 SM:CM-MSA:SAR 2:4.10.2017:2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/