Rajendran .S v. The Madurai Kamaraj University
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI S.Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs
1. The Madurai Kamaraj University, Rep. by its Registrar, University Campus, Madurai-625 021.
2. The Principal, Madurai Kamaraj University College, University Campus, Madurai-625 021.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 17.02.2024 and pass appropriate orders to regularize his service as in the post of Clerk / Assistant in one of the 177 available permanent vacancy in 2nd respondent University with effect from completion of his 10 years service without break i.e., from 17.07.2019 with all consequential monetary and service benefits, within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.
1/5
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram For Respondents : Mr.T.Sakthikumaran Standing Counsel
ORDER
The present writ petition has been filed to regularize the service of the petitioner on completion of their 10 years service without break with all consequential monetary and service benefits, within the time stipulated by this Court.
2. Similar matter came to be dealt with by this Court in W.P(MD)No. 18974 of 2022, dated 04.01.2024, in which, similar cases of CPCLR was considered and favourable orders were passed in favour of the consolidated employees/petitioners therein. In this case also, the petitioner made representation to regularize his service in the available permanent vacancy in respondent University, on completion of his 10 years service without break with all consequential monetary and service benefits. For the sake of convenience, the details of the service rendered by the writ petitioner is tabulated as follows.
2/5
Date on completion of 10 years Service period as on today Sl.No Writ Petition Number Name of the writ petitioner Date of entry into service W.P.(MD)4812/2024 S.Rajendran 17.07.2009 17.07.2019 14.6 However, the representation of the petitioner was not acted upon till date. Hence, this writ petition came to be filed.
3. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondents to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, nonconsideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India and direct the respondents to consider the same within a stipulated time.
4. Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for by the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, this Court hereby direct the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate 3/5
orders, in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
04.03.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes gbg 4/5
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
gbg ORDER IN 04.03.2024 5/5