Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6950/2015allowed

Krishnasamy v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-04-16Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Sixteenth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.6950 of 2015 1 KRISHNASAMY 2 ROHINI 3 KAMALAM 4 VELLAIAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1,2,3 & 5 Vs STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MELUR TALUK., MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 164/2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.V.ARUN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are A1 to A3 and A5 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 294(B), 323, 355, 324, 120(B) and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.164 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive, there was a wordy alteration between the accused persons and the husband of the de-facto complainant and due to which, the petitioners along with the other accused persons attacked the defacto complainant's husband and caused injuries. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent person and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharge from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the 1st petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation and the petitioners 2 to 4 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 16/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR 2 -DO-THRO'THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MELUR TK., MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.V.ARUN Advocate SR.No.19015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6950 of 2015 Date :16/04/2015 NA/16/04/2015/P2/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/