Dhanapandi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourteenth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.7048 of 2015 1 DHANAPANDI 2 JEYALAKSHMI 3 DURAIPANDI 4 MURUGAPANDI 5 UMAMAHESWARI 6 SIVANESH PANDI 7 VANAJA 8 MURUGESAN 9 SELVAMANI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.A2 TO A.7 & A9 TO A.11 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NILAKOTTAI DINDIGUL DIST. IN CR.NO. 7 OF 2015.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.SURESH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute between the de-facto complainant and the accused has been settled out of Court and the First Information Report was also quashed by this Court. Hence, there is no apprehension of arrest. Recording the submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/- 14/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NILAKOTTAI,DINDIGUL DIST. 2 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 3 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT,NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,DINDIGUL ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7048 of 2015 Date :14/08/2015 JAM/JGB/LIB/20.8.15/1P-5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/