Vinoth v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10422 of 2016 Vinoth .. Petitioner Vs.

The State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vadipatti Police Station, Madurai District.

.. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent Police not to harass the petitioner without due process of law.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Balan For respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent Police frequently called the petitioner to the Police Station and harassed him under the guise of enquiry. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner and gave an undertaking that if at all the presence of the petitioner is required, the respondent would call the petitioner for enquiry only after issuing summons giving specific date, time and place. He would further submit that the respondent did not cause any harassment to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Recording the above undertaking given by the learned Government Advocate, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, Vadipatti Police Station, Madurai District.

2.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 cc to M/s.P.Balan, Advocate in SR.No.34401 gcg CSL/GSV-PM/18.07.2016 :2P/4C Crl.O.P(MD)No.10422 of 2016 29.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/