Aasai Selvan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Moolakaraipatty
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Aasai Selvan
...Petitioner/Accused
Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Moolakaraipatty Police Station, Tirunelveli.
(Crime No. 168 of 2024 )
...Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Prithviraj Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 168 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.
1/6
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 466, 468, 471 of IPC in Crime No. 168 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the Village Administrative Officer. On 03.05.2024, he received an application of one Eassakipandi from the Registrare of Moolakaraipatty. On perusal of the same, he found that the Adangal enclosed with the records was not issued by him and his signature and office seal were forged and that the document was a fabricated one. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner's name is not mentioned in the FIR and during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner appeared before the respondent police and co2/6
operate with the enquiry. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submits that the petitioner is an unnamed accused and he has acted as broker in purchasing the land and he has no previous case. Hence, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, and also considering the facts that the petitioner is an unnamed accused in the FIR and even according to the prosecution, he has acted as broker for purchasing the land and he has no previous case and also during the pendency of the petition also, the petitioner appeared before the respondent police and co-operate with the enquiry, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:
3/6
[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the leanred Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation.
[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner 4/6
released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
(P D B J) 24.03.2026 apd To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri.
2.The Inspector of Police, Moolakaraipatty Police Station, Tirunelveli.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
P. DHANABAL, J apd
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No. 3229 of 2026 Date : 24.03.2026 6/6