Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7134/2015disposed of

R.Ramaraju v. The Superintendent Of Police

2015-04-21Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21/4/2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7134 of 2015 R.Ramaraju ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police Trichy District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Jeevapuram Trichy District.

3. State rep. By The Inspector of Police Manachanallur Police Station , Trichy District.

4. The Sub-Inspector of Police Pulivalam Police Station Trichy District.

5. The Inspector of Police CBCID Trichy District.

...

Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the first respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.12 of 2014 on the file of the fourth respondent to the fifth respondent and to take action against the respondents 2 to 4 for delaying to exercise their file FIR, writing a fake date of complaint receipt and FIR and failing to exercise their statutory duty.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.P.Thirusangu For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) - - - - - -

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to direct the first respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.12 of 2014 on the file of the fourth respondent to the fifth respondent and to take action against the respondents 2 to 4 for delaying to exercise their file FIR, writing a fake date of complaint receipt and FIR and failing to exercise their statutory https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

duty.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the first complaint given on 22/1/2014 has not been taken on file. Thereafter, a second complaint was also given. The petitioner named a specific person by name Divya Priya, D/o.Rajendran, but no enquiry has been done against the said person.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that a special team has been constituted to nab the accused persons, as they are unknown.

4. It is a specific case of the petitioner that the named accused person has been involved in the alleged offence. There is nothing on record to show that any attempt has been made to enquire that person.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to direct the first respondent to transfer the investigation from the fourth respondent to any other Officer under his control.(*)The first respondent superintendent of Police Trichy,is directed to monitor and Supervice the investigation.

6. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) (*)CORRECTED AS PER ORDER OF THIS COURT DATED 22-07-2015 MADE IN CRL OP(MD)No.7134 of 2015 Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To SUBSTITUTED THE ORDER ALREADY DESPATCHED ON 18/05/2015

1. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Jeevapuram, Trichy District.

3. The Inspector of Police Manachanallur Police Station , Trichy District.

4. The Sub-Inspector of Police Pulivalam Police Station , Trichy District.

5. The Inspector of Police, CBCID , Trichy District.

6. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +One cc to M/s.C.P.Thirusangu, Advocate, SR.No.20467 mvs RL/8c - 7/5/2015 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7134 of 2015 RG 11 8 15 8C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 21/4/2015