G.Manimaran v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.07.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10528 of 2016 G.Manimaran .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner based on the complaint of the petitioner, dated 23.06.2016.

For Petitioner : No appearance For respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2.No representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents. 3.It is stated in the petition that the second respondent police frequently called the petitioner and harassed him under the guise of enquiry.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by one Subbulakshmi against the petitioner, petition enquiry has been conducted and closed. He would further submit that the second respondent Police https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

did not cause any harassment to the petitioner. 5.In view of the fact that the petition filed against the petitioner has been enquired and closed, there is no scope for further harassment. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District.

3.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Gcg CSL/PEK/19.07.2016 :2P/4C Crl.O.P(MD)No.10528 of 2016 05.07.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/