Madras High CourtWP(MD)/13421/2019disposed of

R.Subbukalai, S/O.Ramar, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2019-06-14Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.(MD)No.13421 of 2019 R.Subbukalai ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent dated 07.06.2019 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to provide appropriate police protection with necessary permission for conducting of Adal Paadal programme which is scheduled to be conducted on 18.06.2019 in Sri Muthallamman Koil situate in S.Pudukottai, Patchamalayankottai Village, Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thangapandian For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the order dated 07.06.2019 passed by the second respondent and consequently to direct the respondents to provide appropriate police protection with necessary permission for conducting of Adal Paadal programme which is scheduled to be conducted on 18.06.2019 in Sri Muthallamman Koil situate in S.Pudukottai, Patchamalayankottai Village, Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that seeking permission and protection to conduct Adal Padal Programme on 18.06.2019 in the above said temple, the petitioner made a representation on 07.06.2019 and the said request was rejected by the second respondent on the same day. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation to the second respondent. On making such representation, the second respondent is directed to consider the same and pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with law, forthwith.

5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar(CS- ) ta To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Copy To: The Government Advocate, Criminal Side, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.R.THANGAPANDIAN, Advocate ( SR-68689[F] dated 14/06/2019 ) Order made in W.P.(MD)No.13421 of 2019 Dated: 14.06.2019 ES/18.06.2019/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/