T.Suresh v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Seventeenth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.7214 of 2015 1 T.SURESH 2 R.THANGARAJ ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUKOKARNAM POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DIST.
IN CR.NO. 69 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.K.AZAGARSAMI Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who arrayed as A1 and A2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b) and 307 of IPC in Crime No.69 of 2015, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant asked for a chair which was refused by the accused and subsequently wordy quarrel arose and the first petitioner attacked the de facto complainant with knife.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioners were running Betel-nut shop, where the wordy quarrel arose between the accused and the de facto complainant, in which A1 attacked the de facto complainant. It is further submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the
hospital, I am inclined to grant grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 17/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PUDUKKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PUDUKKOTTAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUKOKARNAM POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.7214 of 2015 Date :17/04/2015 AA/23.04.2015/2p- 5c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/