Mundan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eleventh day of April Two Thousand and Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.5717 of 2018 MUNDAN ... PETITIONER / 7th ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIVAIKUNDAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, CR.NO.76/2018.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as 7th accused . He was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.03.2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 506(ii) & 307 IPC in Crime No.76 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police. He seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy altercation arose between the defacto complainant and the accused persons and that the accused persons caused severe life threat to the defacto complainant with dire consequences. Therefore, based on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, a case has been registered against the petitioner along with other accused persons. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that due to previous enmity a false has case been registered and that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for bail in favour of the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) has strongly opposed the grant bail to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is having previous case.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. This Court went through the facts of this case. No injury has been caused to the victim. Taking note of the background of the

case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions; (i)the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam.

(ii)the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. (iii)the petitioner shall not abscond.

(iv)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 11/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, PERURANI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIVAIKUNDAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate SR.No.5923.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5717 of 2018 Date :11/04/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ SDS/CM:VR/GSR/11.04.2018/2P/7C