Sudalai @ Suresh v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eleventh day of July Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.10731 of 2016 1 SUDALAI @ SURESH 2 RAMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 3 & 4 Vs THE STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTHUMALAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 124 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused nos. 3 and 4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 379 (Sand) of the IPC r/w. 21(iv) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1951 in Crime No.124 of 2016, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners alleged to have transported 1⁄4 unit of sand without any valid permit, by using Tractor bearing Regn.Nos.TN76 Ac 9145 and TN 76L1150 respectively. On complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioners.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioners alleged to have transported one unit of sand and the investigation of the case is pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.3,000/- to the credit of Crime No.124 of 2016 and each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am until further orders.
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 11/07/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TRP TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TENKASI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,UTHUMALAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.35468 GJM/SKS/RR/SAR-III-18.7.16-2P-6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10731 of 2016 Date :11/07/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/