Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7586/2015ordered

Ramakrishnan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-04-22Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.7586 of 2015 1 RAMAKRISHNAN 2 KARTHICK 3 DEEN @ MOORTHY 4 SAMPANTHAM 5 JEGAN 6 GUGAN 7 PRAKASH ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 & 7 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAPISTHALAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT CRIME NO.71/2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT(S) For Petitioner : M/S.S.PARI Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A7, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C in Crime No.71 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is alleged that there was wordy quarrel and none sustained injury in this case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any such offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) submitted that none sustained injury in this case.

5.Heard both sides and also perused the entire materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam, Thanjavur District, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 22/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PAPANASAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 2 Do - Through THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAPISTHALAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.S.PARI Advocate SR.No. 21133. TS/23.04.2015/2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7586 of 2015 Date :22/04/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/