Shiney Gifta Sharon v. The Commissioner Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR CRL.O.P.(MD)No.13804 of 2017 Shiney Gifta Sharon : Petitioner -Vs1.The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Commissioner of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Avaniapuram Police Station, Avaniapuram, Madurai District.

3.The Manager, Sriram City Union Finance Ltd., 186, Bye-pass Road, Chandra Gandhi Nagar, Madurai - 625 016.

: Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to direct the second respondent to register the complaint on the basis of the complaint dated 18.09.2017 of the petitioner's sister husband and seize the petitioner's vehicle namely INNOVA-25G car made by Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd., bearing registration No.TN-64-L-4869 which is under the custody of the third respondent and hand over the same to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition is filed for issuing a direction to the second respondent to register the complaint dated 18.09.2017 lodged by the petitioner as against the third respondent. 2.It is stated that the complaint is regarding financial transaction between the petitioner and the third respondent. It is stated that the dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent is settled in the sense that the third respondent who is the financier and who has given vehicle loan to the petitioner, has rescheduled payment. It appears that the vehicle which is the subject matter of hire purchase agreement was seized by the third https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondent. It is only in this connection, a complaint was lodged. It is stated further that the amount that was due from the petitioner to the third respondent has been partly collected and the amount payable in installment is regularised so as to return the vehicle back to the petitioner. Since the dispute is temporarily resolved, the learned counsel for the petitioner has no grievance and there is no necessity for registering the complaint as against the third respondent. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Commissioner of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Avaniapuram Police Station, Avaniapuram, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to M/S.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi, Advocate SR.No. 85737 CRL.O.P.(MD)No.13804 of 2017 07.11.2017 SRM JM/MR KKR/SAR 2/27.11.2017/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/