Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/1104/2016disposed of

Jeya Selvarani v. The Director General Of Police

2016-01-25Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.01.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL.OP.(MD)No.1104 of 2016 Jeya Selvarani : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Trichy.

3.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Sivagangai.

: Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to not to harass the petitioner based on the present same false complaint made before the 3rd respondent by Sukumar the father of earlier complainant Senthilvel which is pending enquiry before the 2nd respondent.

For Petitioner :Ms.T.Banumathy For Respondents :Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate(Crl. Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, directing the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner, based on the present complaint made before the 3rd respondent by one Sukumar, who the father of earlier complainant Senthilvel, which is pending enquiry before the 2nd respondent.

2. The main grievance of petitioner is that without any valid reason, the 3rd respondent police is harassing the petitioner. The said submission of the petitioner is gainsaid by the Government Advocate (crl.side).

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), on instruction, would submit that petition enquiry was conducted and there is no such harassment against the petitioner and if any interrogation or any further investigation is needed by the respondent against the petitioner, the norms which are mentioned in the Judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610, would be followed. He would further submit that there will not be any harassment and the enquiry or interrogation would be done in accordance with law.

4. Recording the statement of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the 3rd respondent police would not harass the petitioner in future under the guise of any enquiry, the criminal original Petition is closed. The petitioner is directed to co-operate with the enquiry. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Trichy.

3.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Sivagangai.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.T.Banumathy, Advocate SR.No.4367 Order made in CRL.OP.(MD)No.1104 of 2016 Dated:- 25.01.2016 MPK NS/PM-MP/05.02.2016 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/