Santha, v. Sri Kanyakumari Gurukula Ashram

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and C.M.P(MD) No.2721 of 2022 1.Santha 2.S.Subramanian ... Petitioners Vs.

Sri Kanyakumari Gurukula Ashram, Rep by its Superintendent Mr.Sivaramakrishnan (died), Sir Kanyakumari Gurukula Ashram, Rep. by is Superintendent Mrs.A.Seetha Ramya, W/o.Vignesh, at South Karunkulam Village, Seetharamapuram, Pazhuvur Post, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli Nellai, Kattapomman District.

...Respondent

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed by the I Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil dated 07.03.2022 in E.P.No.87 of 2012 in O.S.No.98 of 1995. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham 1/4

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is listed today under the caption 'for reporting compliance'.

2.This Court vide order dated 02.07.2025 has issued the following directions:

"The parties have appeared before this Court. 2.The issue is with regard to the 3 feet encroachment made by the petitioner, which is nearly 140 sq.ft, in the Ashramam belonging to the respondent. The respondent succeeded the case before the Lower Appellate Court as well as before this Court. Thereafter, E.P. has been filed. As against which the present Civil Revision Petition came to be filed by the petitioner. 3.The matter was amicably settled and the respondent Board was convened and upset price was fixed at Rs.15 Lakhs for the encroached portion. On behalf of the above Ashram, Mr.Vignesh, the Administrator of the Ashram is before this Court.

4.Mr.Subramanian, second petitioner herein appeared before this Court and he also agreed to pay Rs.15 Lakhs to the respondent on or before 25.08.2025.

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.15 Lakhs to the respondent on or before 25.08.2025.

6.Post the matter on 25.08.2025, "for reporting compliance". 2/4

3.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondent submit that the directions issued by this Court were complied with and the parties have entered into a compromise memo.

4.In view of the compromise reached between the parties, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

25.08.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes / No ta To 1.The I Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil.

2. The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

ta 25.08.2025 4/4