Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13844/2017closed

A.Arun Richard v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-10-12Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.13844 of 2017 1 A.ARUN RICHARD 2 ALPHONSE 3 BACKIA RANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Rank Not Known Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALLAKULAM ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CR NO NOT KNOWN OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.M.PRISCILLA JANCY Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/accused persons, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 498(a), 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC., in Crime No. Not Known of 2017, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the marriage between the defacto complainant and the first petitioner was solemnized on 21.04.2013. The second and third petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant. The defacto complainant made allegations against the petitioners on the ground of cruelty. Based on the complaint, case has been registered for the above said offences against the petitioners.

3.The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State, on instructions, would submit that based on the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and as per the direction of this Court, each and every District have formed a District Level Committee in order to settle the issues related to Section 498(A) of IPC cases. Accordingly, the case was referred to the District Level Committee for proper decision. Hence, this anticipatory bail petition is pre-matured one.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Recording the statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed as pre-matured. However, if any adverse order passed by the District Level Committee, it is open to the petitioners to work out the remedy in the manner known to law.

sd/- 12/10/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALLAKULAM ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.F.X.EUGENE Advocate SR.No. 32859 JAM/20.10.17/CM-MSA/SAR 2 / 2P-4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13844 of 2017 Date :12/10/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/