Manikandan @ Mani v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.7726 of 2015 MANIKANDAN @ MANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DT, CRIME NO.140/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.SURESH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.1 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 4(2)(c), 5(1) and 3(1) of ITP Act in Crime No.140 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 09.04.2014 at 11.30 a.m., while the de-facto complainant was standing before the lodge, the petitioner along with the other accused called the de-facto complainant for prostitution.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the accused 2 and 3 were arrested and released on bail and the petitioner does not have any previous case and the charge sheet filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nilakottai.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nilakottai as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 24/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,NILAKOTTAI.
2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,NILAKOTTAI.
4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 5.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.R.SURESH KUMAR Advocate SR.No.22613
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.7726 of 2015 Date :24/04/2015 rg.28.04.2015 2p.7c.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/