Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4364/2020disposed of

Radhakrishnan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2020-03-10Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4364 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.03.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.4364 of 2020 Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, to issue a direction directing the respondents not to harass the petitioner and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with or disturb the peaceful conduct of the petitioner's business offering various health therapies under the name and style of Vrindha Ayurvedic Theraphy Care, at No.17/58, A2, Convent Road, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.C.Maniyarasu For Respondents : Mr.A.Robinson Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

The petitioner alleges harassment at the hands of the third respondent.

2.The petitioner claims to be running a Ayurvedic Massage Centre. The petitioner had earlier moved this Court for the relief of anticipatory bail. Then, he filed Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3565 of 2020 before this Court. On both occasions, statement was made on the side of the police that the petitioner is not figuring as an accused in any criminal case.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) clearly states that the petitioner need not have to fear any harassment at the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4364 of 2020 hands of the third respondent. It is made clear that if the third respondent wants to raid the petitioner's premises, the third respondent will get a formal search warrant from the jurisdictional Magistrate. If the third respondent wants to enquire the petitioner, the third respondent will issue summons in writing. If the third respondent registers any FIR against the petitioner, the petitioner will be duly notified, so that, the petitioner will have breathing time to move this Court for the relief of anticipatory bail.

4.With this direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmi To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.K.C.MANIYARASU, Advocate ( SR-10736[F] dated 10/03/2020 ) Crl.O.P(MD)No.4365 of 2020 10.03.2020 AP(20/03/2020) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2