Christober v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Thirteenth day of October Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.13914 of 2017 CHRISTOBER ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIRANGAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.833 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.VENKATESAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) IPC., and Section 7(i) (a) CLA Act, in Crime No. 833 of 2017, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the police registered a case against the petitioner for creating nuisance in the public place.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State would submit that the investigation is still pending and hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that investigation is still pending, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned Judicial Magistrate, No.III, Trichy on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks; (ii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (iii) the petitioner shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the investigation officer;

(iv) the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail;

(v) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 13/10/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, TRICHY.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIRANGAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.P.VENKATESAN Advocate SR.No.32826

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.13914 of 2017 Date :13/10/2017 MS/CM-MSA/SAR.2/20.10.2017/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/