← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/4670/2022disposed of

Bhaskaran.V.K.M. v. The Thasildar

2022-06-22Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.4670 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.4670 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3903, 3904 & 9034 of 2022 V.K.M.Bhaskaran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Thasildar, Thiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruchendur, Thoothukudi Distirct.

3.The Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

4.Selvin ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.A3/100/2021, dated 31.01.2022 with regard to management of the temple and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthik For R1 to R3 : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate For R4 : Mr.B.Kumar Senior Counsel for Mr.T.Sudhanraj

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for R1 to R3 and the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the fourth respondent.

2. The subject matter of the writ petition pertains to the affairs of the Sri Parvathi Amman Temple and Sri Muthumalai Ayyan Temple located in Seenanthoppu, Kadhasamypuram Village, Thiruchendur Taluk. While the fourth respondent would claim to be the secretary of the temple committee, the petitioner disputes the said status. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.4670 of 2022 The challenge in this writ petition is to the endorsement made by the Tahsildar, Thiruchendur in Na.Ka.No.A3/100/2021, dated 31.01.2022. Interim order was granted in this writ petition at the time of admission.

3. As rightly pointed out by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the fourth respondent, the impugned endorsement does not in any way affect the rights of the petitioner.

4. I clarify that the impugned endorsement has no legal or statutory value and that it would not confer right on any of the parties. Such an endorsement is not open to legal challenge. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // /07/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmi To 1.The Thasildar, Thiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruchendur, Thoothukudi Distirct.

3.The Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-13021,SR-27735[F] dated 18/03/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.T. SUDHAN RAJ, Advocate ( SR-27491[F] dated 22/06/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.R.J. KARTHICK, Advocate ( SR-27567[F] dated 22/06/2022 ) W.P.(MD)No.4670 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)No.9034 of 2022 22.06.2022 RD(04.07.2022) 2P 7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2