M. Ameer Sulthan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.788 of 2015 M.AMEER SULTHAN ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE R.S. MANGALAM POLICE STATION, R.S.MANGALAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.9 OF 2015 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.NEELAMEGAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.9 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that no one injured in this case and there is no previous case as against this petitioner.

3. Considering the fact that no one sustained injury in this case and that the petitioner has no previous antecedent, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 20/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R.S. MANGALAM POLICE STATION, R.S.MANGALAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.K.NEELAMEGAM Advocate SR.No.2610 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.788 of 2015 Date :20/01/2015 PBK 21/01/2015 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/