Kariammal, v. The Sub Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.11185 of 2016 1 KARIAMMAL, ...PARTY IN PERSON/MOTHER OF ACCUSED 2 LINGASAMY, ... PETITIONERS/4th ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANI TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.253 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.MANI ANANDH Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.4 was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.06.2016 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,148,353 and 506(i) of IPC and Section 3(1) of the TNPPDL Act in Crime No.253 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel in the temple festival the petitioner along with other accused attacked the defacto complainant with deadly weapons and also pelted stones against him and Police people and caused damages to the two-wheeler glass of the respondent Police worth about Rs.350/- and also threatened him with dire consequences. On complaint, a case has been registered for the above said offences.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 02.06.2016 and prays for enlarging the petitioner on bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) submitted that it is simple injury and the investigation of the case is pending. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that it is a simple injury, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
following conditions:
(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani.
(ii)the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 am until further orders. (iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
6.The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate, as to whether the petitioner is complying with the condition or not. sd/- 06/07/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI.
2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE DISTRICT JAIL, DINDIGUL 4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
5 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANI TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S P.MANI ANANDH Advocate SR.No.35192.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.11185 of 2016 Date :06/07/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ AM/NGM.MP/SAR-III/06.07.2016/2P/7C