Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/1400/2017dismissed as infructuous

M. Pandiammal v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-06-11Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1400 of 2017 M.Pandiammal : Petitioner

Versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Vickramangalam Police Station, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.

3. Jeyanathan

4. Otchu

5. Singam 6.Thavasi : Respondents Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein to provide adequate and necessary protection to the petitioner for cutting down the trees bounded in the petitioner land comprised in Survey No.299/5 on the basis of the representation dated 31.01.2017.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan, Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondents 3to6 : No Appearance

O R D E R

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submitted that the relief sought for in the present Petition has become infructuous.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Vickramangalam Police Station, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1400 of 2017 BUC(20/06/2019)2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/