Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7841/2015disposed of

Veerapandian v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-04-24Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.7841 of 2015 VEERAPANDIAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SESSIONS COURT POLICE STATION, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.

... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.C.NAGAMUTHU Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is the sole accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C.No.404 of 2006 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the case was taken on file in the year 2006, the petitioner is not responsible for the delay and he has been regularly appearing before the Court and only on 23.07.2014, he could not appear before the Court and Non-Bailable Warrant was issued. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner is having reasonable apprehension that he may be arrested by the respondent police. He would further submit that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the trial Court all future hearing dates.

3. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on all the dates of hearings, except on those days by filing a petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C., by assigning valid reasons. The petitioner shall comply with the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

condition stipulated under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 24/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, TRICHY 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SESSIONS COURT POLICE STATION, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.

4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.C.NAGAMUTHU Advocate SR.No.22409

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7841 of 2015 Date :24/04/2015 NA/28/04/2015/P2/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/