Madras High CourtWP(MD)/4409/2026closed

M/S. Yoga And Co., v. The Superintending Engineer (Highways)

2026-02-20Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.02.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR WP(MD) NO. 4409 of 2026 and WMP(MD) Nos. 3664, 3665 and 3670 of 2026 M/s. Yoga and Co., Represented by its Proprietrix/Partner S. Rokini Meena W/o N. Suresh Babu Flat No. 11, 4th Floor Saathveeka Apartments Kannadhasan Main Street SS Colony Bypass Road Madurai 625016.

....Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Superintending Engineer (Highways) Virudhunagar Highways Construction and Maintenance Circle Tirunelveli.

2.The Divisional Engineer (Highways) Virudhunagar Highways Construction and Maintenance Division Virudhunagar.

.....Respondent(s) Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, to call for the records of the 2nd Respondent in respect of the impugned order in 1/4

his Letter No. (CRIDP-Tender)-2/2025-26/D3) dated 13.02.2026 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to issue Work Site Inspection Certificate and Working Condition of Plant and Machinery Certificate as envisaged in the Tender Notice No. 43/2025-2026/HDO/Dated 03.02.2026, issued by the 1st Respondent, so as to enable the Petitioner to upload the same and participate in the bidding process. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.R.Kavinprasath For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Ajmalkhan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.M.Gangatharan Government Advocate

ORDER

The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the second respondent wherein the request of the petitioner for issuance of Work Site Inspection Certificate and Working Condition of Plant and Machinery Certificate have been rejected.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he would like to withdraw the writ petition. Further he submits that the observation made in the impugned order shall not affect his participation in the future tender.

3.A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the petitioner's technical bid has been rejected on the grounds that certain documents are not genuine. 2/4

However, this would not attract the Clauses of the tender document for blacklisting the petitioner. It is made clear that no proceedings shall be initiated as against the writ petitioner for blacklisting him on the observations made in the impugned order.

4.With the above said observations, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 20-02-2026 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No msa To

1. The Superintending Engineer (Highways) Virudhunagar Highways Construction and Maintenance Circle Tirunelveli.

2. The Divisional Engineer (Highways) Virudhunagar Highways Construction and Maintenance Division Virudhunagar 3/4

R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.

msa WP(MD) NO. 4409 of 2026 AND WMP(MD) Nos. 3664, 3665 and 3670 of 2026 20.02.2026 4/4