Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7896/2015ordered

Sathyamoorthi @ Ravi v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-05-06Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixth day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.7896 of 2015 1 SATHYAMOORTHI @ RAVI 2 UDHAYA 3 GANAPATHI ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 3 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOTTIAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

CR.NO. 101/2015.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.VADIVELAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.101 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(i) of I.P.C., the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case against the petitioners.

4. Under such circumstances, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Musiri on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioners 1 and 3 shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation and the second petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required.

[b] the petitioners shall give their thumb impression, specimen signatures and handwritings.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] The Inspector of Police concerned, is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), whether the petitioners are complying with the order or not. sd/- 06/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUSIRI, TIRHCY DISTRICT. 2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THOTTIAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.T.VADIVELAN Advocate SR.No.25113 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7896 of 2015 Date :06/05/2015 PBK/AMF 07/05/2015 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/