Mohammed Hanifa v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.7909 of 2015 MOHAMMED HANIFA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.19/2010 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.XAVIER Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is A1 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police, in pursuance of the Non-Bailable Warrant issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi, in connection with a case in C.C.No.124 of 2012 for the alleged offences punishable under sections 406 and 420 of IPC, in Crime No.19 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had met with an accident and therefore, he could not appear before the trial court on 27.06.2014 and therefore, Non-Bailable Warrant was issued against him.

3.The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner will appear before the trial court for all future hearings without fail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that totally three accused in this case and except, the petitioner others have been regularly appearing before the trial court. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before trial court for all future hearings without fail. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 28/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ALANGUDI.

2.

-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.XAVIER Advocate SR.No. 23889 SR/AMF : 05.05.2015 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7909 of 2015 Date :28/04/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/