Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14079/2017dismissed

M.Subramani v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-10-23Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Third day of October Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.14079 of 2017 1 M.SUBRAMANI 2 P.SELVARASU ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ODDANCHATRAM TOWN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.273/2017 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.N.SYED ALI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/accused No.1 and 2, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 420 IPC, in Crime No.273 of 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant approached the petitioners in order to survey the property and he paid huge amount to that effect. However, the petitioners favoured another person in order to cheat the defacto complainant. Accordingly, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint before the respondent police.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they prayed for anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the state would submit that the petitioners are not a registered surveyor or registered draftsman. However, they created fictitious records as if is a draftsman and he have two similar type of cases. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Anticipatory bail petition is dismissed.

sd/- 23/10/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ODDANCHATRAM TOWN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.N.SYED ALI Advocate SR.No.33039

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14079 of 2017 Date :23/10/2017 MV:RR-BS:SAR4:26/10/2017/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/