Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14943/2019dismissed

T.Chandrasekar v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-07-05Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.(MD)No.14943 of 2019 T.Chandrasekar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Melattur Police Station, Thanjavur District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to grant permission and to provide police protection to conduct the "Aadalum Paadalum" dance programme on 08.07.2019 in pursuant to the Maha Kumbabishegam of Arulmigu Sree Drowpathai Amman - Sree Varadharaja Vinayagar Temple, situated at Melattur Karambai Village, Papanasam Taluk, Thanjavur District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 20.06.2019 and 01.07.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sudhasathy Anand For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to grant permission and to provide police protection to conduct the "Aadalum Paadalum" dance programme on 08.07.2019 in pursuant to the Maha Kumbabishegam of Arulmigu Sree Drowpathai Amman - Sree Varadharaja Vinayagar Temple, situated at Melattur Karambai Village, Papanasam Taluk, Thanjavur District by considering the petitioner's representations dated 20.06.2019 and 01.07.2019.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Heard both sides.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that seeking permission and protection to conduct the Adal Padal Programme on 08.07.2019 in the above said temple, the petitioner made representations on 20.06.2019 and 01.07.2019 to the respondents and the said representation was not considered so far. Hence, the present Writ Petition has been filed for the aforesaid relief.

4. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the representations of the petitioner dated 20.06.2019 and 01.07.2019 has already been considered and permission has been rejected by the second respondent.

5. In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the prayer as such sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted at this stage. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-I) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) ta To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Melattur Police Station, Thanjavur District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.B.Sudha Sathiyananth, Advocate in SR.73682 Order made in W.P.(MD)No.14943 of 2019 Dated: 05.07.2019 PBK(16.07.2019) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/