Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7968/2015ordered

Natheemnainar v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-04-27Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.7968 of 2015 NATHEEMNAINAR ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATHALAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.321/2014.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.PRASANNA RAJADURAI, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who is the sole accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.321 of 2014, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioner is alleged to have abused the de facto complainant in filthy language and threatened her in dire consequences.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner is absconding and charge sheet has been filed in this case.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai, Dindugal District and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 27/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATHALAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.PRASANNA RAJADURAI, Advocate SR.No.22646. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7968 of 2015 Date :27/04/2015 msm 28.04.2015 p2/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/