Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8047/2015ordered

Abdul Salim 2 Amj Salim v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-04-27Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.8047 of 2015 1 ABDUL SALIM @ AMJ SALIM 2 JAFERULLAH @ WORKSHOP JAFERULLAH 3 MOHAMED IQBAL @ BOMBAY IQBAL, 4 MUBARAK 5 KATHER 6 MOHAMED SHIEK FARITH 7 MOHAMED HALITH USSAIN @ HALITH, 8 MOHAMED SYED AFRIDI @ MYDEEN AFRIDI, 9 SHIEK ABDULLAH @ SHIEK ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 9 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CUMBUM NORTH POLICE STATION, THENI.

CR. NO. 170/2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.MOHAMED YUSUF Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who arrayed as A1 to A9 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC (*)and Section 4 of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.170 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners are alleged to have damaged the properties belonged to the Pallivasal and threatened the de faacto complainant with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioners have not involved in any previous case.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioners 1 to 3 and 5 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am until further orders and the petitioners 4 and 6 to 9 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 27/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / (*)Amended as per order dated.04.06.2015 and made in MP(MD)No.1/2015 in Crl.OP(MD)No.8047/2015 and Time for executing sureties is extended by two weeks, from which date the order copy made ready.

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO (*)To be substituted order already despatched. 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM.

2 Do - Through THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CUMBUM NORTH POLICE STATION, THENI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.MOHAMED YUSUF Advocate SR.No.27596 TS/29.04.2015/2P-6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8047 of 2015 Date :27/04/2015 PBK/PPS 10/06/2015 ::2P-6C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/