Baskaran v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.805 of 2015 BASKARAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DEVIPATTINAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
CR. NO.238/2014. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.AMUDHA MURALI Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323 IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.238 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. It is alleged that the petitioner had assaulted the complainant and abused in filthy language
3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that injured has been discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against this petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramnad, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
sd/- 20/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, RAMNAD.
2.
-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DEVIPATTINAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.R.AMUDHA MURALI Advocate SR.No. 2465 SR : 22.01.2015 : 2P/6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.805 of 2015 Date :20/01/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/