Muthubharathi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.8069 of 2015 1 MUTHUBHARATHI 2 MICHAEL@MICHAELRAJKUMAR 3 ARIVALAGAN 4 ARAVIND 5 RAJASEKARAN 6 ABIMANYU ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 6 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MADUKKUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 158 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as A1 to A6 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324,336 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.158 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the de facto complainant with iron rod and pipe.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has discharged from the hospital and the petitioners have no previous case.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Musif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District and on each of them are executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the above said Magistrate daily at 10.00 am until further orders The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 27/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PATTUKKOTTAI THANJAVUR DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MADUKKUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.23033 RL/6 C- 29/4/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8069 of 2015 Date :27/04/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/