← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/5086/2022ordered

Bagurudheen v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-03-18Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18.03.2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR

1. Bagurudheen

2. Parveen Banu

3. Bavusiya

4. Abdul Salam

5. Sagar Banu

6. Deensha ... Petitioners/Accused Nos 1 to 6 Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kottambatti Police Station, Kottambatti, Madurai District.

(Crime No.50 of 2022)

...Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioners: Mr.S.A.S.Alaudeen, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.50 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 427, 379 and 506(2) IPC and 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.50 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

1/3

2.The case of the prosecution is that there existed family dispute between the parties, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant's brother-in-law, who is the husband of the second petitioner, abused him in filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences and also damaged his car. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the injured was already discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the facts that there existed family dispute between the parties, that the injured was already discharged from the hospital and that except the offences under Sections 379 and 506

(2) IPC and 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, all other offences are bailable in nature, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) each to the credit of Crime No.50 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgment before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District.

7.On production of such receipt/acknowledgment, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioners 1 and 4 shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the petitioners 2, 3, 5 and 6 shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. 2/3

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 18/03/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

CSM Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTAMBATTI POLICE STATION, KOTTAMBATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADRUAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5086 of 2022 Date :18/03/2022 PKP/SBN/SAR-1/23.03.2022/3P/5C 3/3