A. Muthuchamy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Ninth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.8202 of 2015 1 A. MUTHUCHAMY 2 KARUPPANAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 4 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIMANTHAYAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST,CRIME NO.41/2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.SELVAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner are A1 and A4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 170, 420 of IPC r/w section 5 of Emblems and Names (Protection of Improper Use) Act, in Crime No.

41 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused used the name of Human Rights Commission and put a flex board by violating the Government Order. Hence, the case has been registered against him. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners undertake that they would not use the name of Human Rights Commission in future. It is further submitted that the petitioners are innocent and has not committed any offence. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the investigation is pending. 5.However, considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Oddanchatram, and on each of them https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 29/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,ODDANCHATRAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KALLIMANTHAYAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.J.SELVAM Advocate SR.No.24410

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8202 of 2015 Date :29/04/2015 AA/05.05.2015/2p- 6c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/