M.Muruganandham v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.07.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11648 of 2016 M.Muruganandham .. Petitioner Vs.
The Inspector of Police, D-3, Koodal Pudur Police Station, Law and Order, Koodal Pudur, Madurai -18.
.. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in the conduct of investigation.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vishnuvanathan For respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)
ORDER
It is an application seeking a direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent police frequently called the petitioner and harassed him under the guise of enquiry.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that no petition and no CSR is pending against the petitioner; the petitioner is not required for any enquiry; and the respondent Police did not cause any harassment to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5.In view of the above submission of the learned Government Advocate, there is no scope for harassment. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSII) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, D-3, Koodal Pudur Police Station, Law and Order, Koodal Pudur, Madurai -18.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai gcg RL/3C/2P/DB/27/7/2016 Crl.O.P(MD)No.11648 of 2016 15/07/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/