M.Balakrishnan v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.06.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Balakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Taluk Office, Dindigul.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sub Collector Office Road, Dindigul.

4.The Tahsildar, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent would conduct an enquiry and add the petitioner's name and other family members name in the revenue records is showed in S.No.192/2, 197/1, 198/2,199, 200, 201, 202 at Kambiliyampatty Village, Dindigul East 1/4

Taluk, Dindigul by way of consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2024.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.N.GA.Natraj Government Advocate

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. The second respondent shall put the interested persons on notice before passing the final order.

3.The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

27.06.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MGA 2/4

To 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Taluk Office, Dindigul.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sub Collector Office Road, Dindigul.

4.The Tahsildar, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

MGA 27.06.2024 4/4