Lakshmanan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fifteenth day of July Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.11718 of 2016 1 LAKSHMANAN 2 MUTHUPANDI @ MUTHUPANDIAN 3 DURAIPANDI @ DURAIPANDIAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP BY. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUNELVELI TALUK POLICE STATION,TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO. 168 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S C.SUSIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC r/w. Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.168 of 2016, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the due to money dispute, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant with hands and abused him in filthy language and also criminally intimidated him. On complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioners.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the investigation of the case is pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirunelveli on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent respondent police daily at 10.00 am until further orders and the petitioners 2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation.
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 15/07/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III,THIRUNELVELI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUNELVELI TALUK POLICE STATION,TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S C.SUSIKUMAR Advocate SR.No.37472
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.11718 of 2016 Date :15/07/2016 AA/SKS-RR/SAR-III/20.07.2016/2P-6C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/