A. Chandramohan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fifteenth day of July Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.11793 of 2016 A. CHANDRAMOHAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.19 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTUR TALUK POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.148/2016) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S R.G.SHANKAR GANESH Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANNITHEVAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as Accused No.19, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 302 IPC, in Crime No.148 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the father of the de facto complainant found missing from 10.05.2016 and on 13.05.2016, his dead body was found in the well outside the village. On complaint, case has been registered for the above said offences. 3.

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner is a resident of Chennai and at the time of occurrence he was in Chennai and he has no way connected with the occurrence and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as A.3. On 11.05.2016, the petitioner along with others arranged for non-vegetarian meals and issued token to the people in a temple festival. The deceased entered into the dining hall without token and when the same was https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

questioned by the A.1, the deceased abused A.1 and others and spitted against the persons who were in the dining hall and due to that the petitioner and other accused assaulted the deceased indiscriminately with hands, kicked him with legs on his chest and neck and caused his death and all the accused dropped the body of the deceased in a well. Investigation is pending. If the petitioner is released on bail, he will tamper the evidence and hamper the investigation.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the serious nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on bail and accordingly this petition is dismissed. sd/- 15/07/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTUR TALUK POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

RL/3C/2P/ARK/PV/SARI/20/7/2016

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11793 of 2016 Date :15/07/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/