Jamal Mohamed v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Ninth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.8454 of 2015 1 JAMAL MOHAMED 2 MOHAMED IQBAL 3 NAWASH KHAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4 Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEMISSAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 48 OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.CHAKARAVARTHI Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.SATHYA CHIDAMBARAM, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as A2 to A4, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.48 of 2015, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners have attacked and criminally intimidated the de facto complainant.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, intervenor and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the de facto complainant has sustained simple injury.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that it is a simple injury, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 29/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARANTHANGI.

2.

-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDIKOTTAI.

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEMISSAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1cc to MR.B.CHAKKARAVARTHI, ADVOCATE IN SR : 24334 SR/AMF : 05.05.2015 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8454 of 2015 Date :29/04/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/