Panneerselvam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Second day of January Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.1185 of 2016 1 PANNEERSELVAM 2 G.MANIVANNAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ORATHANADU POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S M.VIVEKANANDAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.A.SENTHILKUMAR for M/S.P.SESUBALAN RAJA, PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused in Crime No. 29 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) submitted that injured has already been discharged from hospital. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ considering the fact the injured has already been discharged from

hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate -cum-District Munsif, Orathanadu, Thanjavur District, and on their executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. Sd/- 22/01/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRAE CUM DISTRICT MUNSIF,ORATHANADU THANJAVUR DISTRICT 2 DO THRO THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ORATHANADU POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S M.VIVEKANANDAN Advocate SR.No.3665.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.1185 of 2016 Date :22/01/2016 AM/22.01.2016/PM.MP/SAR-II/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/