← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/5523/2025disposed of

A.Thamarai Manalan v. The District Collector

2025-03-03Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.03.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI A.Thamarai Manalan .... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Theni District.

2.The District Revenue Officer, O/o.The District Revenue Officer, Theni District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

4.The Tahsildar, O/o.The Tahsildar, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District.

5.The Village Administrative Officer, O/o.The Village Administrative Officer, Uppukottai Village, Theni District.

... Respondents 1/5

P RAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.3 to delete the wrong entry of the petitioner's patta land comprised in Survey No.276/3 situated in Kamarajapuram Village, Uppukottai revenue Village, Bodinayakanur, Theni District as Government land in revenue records subsequently direct the respondent No.3 to re-issue the patta in the petitioner's name based on the petitioner's representation dated 04.02.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to remove the wrong classification of the petitioner's patta land as Government lands.

2. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would bring to my notice that even in the petitioner's representation to the third respondent, the third respondent has referred the error having crept during the UDR survey and hence, he would 2/5

submit that the competent authority would be the District Revenue Officer.

3. Considering the above, the petitioner is given liberty to make a representation to the second respondent District Revenue Officer seeking necessary corrections to the UDR records within a period two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of any such application from the petitioner within two weeks, the second respondent shall conduct an enquiry and pass suitable orders on the petitioner's request for correction of the UDR records in accordance with law and on its own merits within a period of twelve weeks thereafter.

4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No 03.03.2025 am 3/5

To 1.The District Collector, Theni District.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Theni District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

4.The Tahsildar, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District.

5.The Village Administrative Officer, Uppukottai Village, Theni District.

4/5

P.B. BALAJI , J.

am Order made in Dated:

03.03.2025 5/5