Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14819/2017closed

A.Senthil Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-11-02Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.14819 of 2017 1 A.SENTHIL KUMAR 2 A.GURUVAMMAL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1&2 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ODDANCHATRAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.A.JAYARAMACHANDRAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of IPC., and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.Not Known of 2017, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the marriage between the defacto complainant and the first petitioner was solemnized on 12.03.2012. Thereafter, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint against the petitioners alleging that they had harassed her for demanding more dowry.

3.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State, on instructions, would submit that based on the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and as per the direction of this Court, each and every District have formed a District Level Committee in order to settle the issues related to Section 498(A) of IPC cases. Accordingly, the case was referred to the District Level https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Committee for proper decision. Hence, this anticipatory bail petition is pre-matured one.

5. Recording the statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed as pre-matured. However, if any adverse order passed by the District Level Committee, it is open to the petitioners to work out the remedy in the manner known to law.

sd/- 02/11/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ODDANCHATRAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.A.JAYARAMACHANDRAN Advocate SR.No.33687

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14819 of 2017 Date :02/11/2017 mrn SH/RR/SAR-4:08.11.2017:2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/