Sakthivel v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.8621 of 2015 1 SAKTHIVEL 2 R.SATHYA BAMA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs.
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KENIKKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
CR. NO. 170/2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.R.JEGADEESWARAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 354, 120(b), 147 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.170 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners attacked the de-facto complainant and also abused her in filthy language. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the de-facto complainant is none other than the wife of the first petitioner, who is practicing a lawyer at Ramanathapurm and it is further submitted that the case was registered based on the direction issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapurm under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 13/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II RAMANATHAPURAM.
2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM.
3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KENIKKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.R.JEGADEESWARAN Advocate SR.No.60877 Akm/16.10.2015 /2p-6c/
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.8621 of 2015 Date :13/10/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/