Shanmugaraj v. State Rep.By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of August Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.11980 of 2016 1 SHANMUGARAJ 2 GNANAKALA 3 NAGARAJ ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED(RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION VILATHIKULAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S V.THIRUMAL Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANNITHEVAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard both sides.

2.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) submitted that based on the complaint given by the de facto complainant, the respondent Police has conducted enquiry and the same has been closed.

3.Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side), the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 01/08/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VILATHIKULAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

RL/3C/1P/ARK/PV/SARIII/17/8/2016

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11980 of 2016 Date :01/08/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/