Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12057/2016disposed of

Paramasivan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-07-19Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.07.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.12057 of 2016 Paramasivan .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Murappanadu Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

4.The Branch Manager, Sakthi Finance Limited, No.93-B/1, Thevarpuram Road, Tuticorin - 628 003.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents 1 to 3 that not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry based on the complaint given by the fourth respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Durairaj For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, 1 to 3 Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents 1 to 3. In view of the limited relief sought for, this Court is of the view that notice need not be sent to the third respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the second respondent police frequently called the petitioner and his family members and harassed them under the guise of enquiry in respect of a civil dispute.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that based on the petition filed by the fourth respondent against the petitioner herein, a petition enquiry has been conducted and closed as both the parties reported settlement. He would further submit that the respondents 1 to 3 did not cause any harassment to the petitioner.

5.Since the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the closure report is not yet received by the petitioner, a copy of the closure report is directly given to the learned counsel for the petitioner in the open Court.

6.In view of the above submission of the learned Government Advocate, there is no scope for further harassment. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSII) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Murappanadu Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+One cc to Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthick, Advocate, SR.No.37977 gcg RL/6c/2p/NGM/MP/2/8/2016 Crl.O.P(MD)No.12057 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 19.07.2016